Identity Crisis The Namesake And The Great Gatsby

Identity Crisis in the Namesake and the Great Gatsby An identity is the state of being oneself. Your character is comprised of your past, present, and future. Some individuals are ashamed of who they really are and try to change themselves, or mask their identities. One of the dominant themes that is conveyed throughout The Namesake is the theme of identity. In the novels, everybody is a little lost, or a lot lost, frankly. Each individual struggle with his or her identity, because every person senses the tug and pull of different cultures, different traditions, and different aspirations. The Namesake is about this perpetual dilemma faced by immigrants as they fight to maintain their identities while trying to shake them off at the same†¦show more content†¦He felt courageous, brave, and more importantly, he felt like himself with the name Nikhil. He loses his virginity with the name Nikhil, and that name has led him to meet and have relationships with multiple women (Ruth, Maxine, Bridget and Moushumi). Even after making all determinations to erase his past, his failure to state his identity can be seen through his relationships with women. He lawfully changes his name to Nikhil before he leaves for college. The name Nikhil goes on to represent his individuality and separation from his parents. It also signifies him accepting American culture and distancing away from Indian culture. The change comes into play when people starting calling him Nikhil, it startles him. He likes the name Nikhil better, but he does not feel like Nikhil. On the inside, he feels like Gogol, no matter how much he dislikes the name. This adds to the controversy of his identity: is he Gogol or Nikhil. On the other hand, he is a mix of both: Gogol by day and Nikhil by night. The character Gatsby, from F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel The Great Gatsby, exemplifies the idea of identity. Since Gatsby is ashamed of whom he really is, his attempt to hide his identity by hiding himself; however, it is impossible to change your identity because it is impossible to change the past, therefore they die as who they really are. Jay Gatsby s real name is James Gatz; he had changed his name at the age of seventeen. He is originallyShow MoreRelatedANALIZ TEXT INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS28843 Words   |  116 Pagesthe text reveals under close examination. Any literary work is unique. It is created by the author in accordance with his vision and is permeated with his idea of the world. The reader’s interpretation is also highly individual and depends to a great extent on his knowledge and personal experience. That’s why one cannot lay down a fixed â€Å"model† for a piece of critical appreciation. Nevertheless, one can give information and suggestions that may prove helpful. PLOT The Elements of Plot When we

Society And Culture Unit Of Work Rationale - 1412 Words

Society and Culture Unit of Work Rationale Personal and social identity is a fundamental unit for students as it provides a starting point for them to conceptualise how their personal experiences interconnects with public knowledge and understand the role of socialisation. As mentioned in the assessment the class consists of a diverse number of ethnic backgrounds and ability so this unit is crucial for them to understand how they fit in different social and cultural settings. In a way the diversity found in a class makes for an interesting interactions and discussions which will contribute to their understanding in the unit. This of course is limited by students willingness to share such information thus the activities in this unit have†¦show more content†¦This is important for those students are they can contribute when they are comfortable sharing personal experiences and beliefs and when they are comfortable to use the English language thus avoiding confrontation with t he teacher. For students that have difficult behaviour the intention of using class discussion to provide a space where they can learn to empathise with other people in the classroom and engage with the discussion as an outlet for their need of attention. Class discussions are used widely because they can provide benefits on so many different levels for classroom management and for differentiation. The unit of work will start by exploring how individual identity is built up of a combination personal experiences and social experiences. The context of this unit of work is that it starts after students have started to develop a sense of what their personal identity in previous lessons. The lessons now start to look away from the micro and more towards the meso through understanding the role of location as identity, particularly issues like nationalism and global citizenship. This lesson was left in the unit of work because it shows a lesson where students of different cultural backgrou nds can contribute to the discussion in their own way. Students have room to argue that through the process of globalisation their family may have moved to Australia and this experience is a change in their identity while an equally valid argument can be made that because of

Araby Interpretive James Joyce Free Essays

Araby Araby is a short story about a young boy that falls in love that has little or no experiences on the subject he in turn gets to feel for himself some of the follies that come along with it. Firstly we see the awkwardness the boy demonstrates around his crush. This boy who remains nameless throughout the story we see follow around a girl and spy on her, this in my books isn’t a great way to get the ladies, but on the other hand he is just a boy and the story took place over one hundred years ago so I’m thinking this might have been ok back then so I guess I’ll give him a break. We will write a custom essay sample on Araby Interpretive James Joyce or any similar topic only for you Order Now Next they finally meet late at night in a dark room by chance and the young boy is speechless can’t even remember what he says at first when the girl asks if he’s going to Araby, but he does vow on bringing something back for her. I’d say that’s reasonable, something I have done for a girl I liked, I have also been painfully nervous around a crush so I can relate. Now he’s on a mission putting all the parts in play, he gets permission to attend Araby, then the promise of funding from his uncle to complete the task at hand to win his loves heart. He’s ready to go got everything in order but something doesn’t go right and his uncle comes home awfully late, but the boy pushes to go no matter what he’s made up his mind and he’s going something all of us can relate to at one point or another. Finally getting off the train alone he arrives at Araby, he makes is way to the market only to find most of the booths closed he approaches one but sees only English tea sets and pottery, shortly after that the lights go out and he stands there in the dark feeling angry and disappointed. I think he was just wasn’t mature enough to deal with the situation he was out of his element at Araby, he should be in church, school or playing, he’s too young to be concerned about this kind of stuff, but at least now he’s learned a lesson that love its tough and things don’t always go the way you plan, we have all been there and it sucks and even though what happened to this boy is tiny on the grand scale of relationships it can still hurt. How to cite Araby Interpretive James Joyce, Essay examples

Roman History Essay Example For Students

Roman History Essay Roman HistoryRoman Republican politicians were drawnlargely from an ancient elite of wealthy families. These families,known as the nobility, dominated access to the consulships; between themthey held over 80% of the consulships in the last century of the Republic. Active politics took place within this framework, and was characterisedlargely by personal and political feuds between individual members of theelite. Because this elite was defined by office holding (the nobilityconsisted of those descended from consuls), political activity took placewithin a context of magistracies and public events. Individual membersof the nobility had to pursue careers in politics, not just from theirown ambition, but to preserve the standing of their families: the Sergiiin the middle years of the republic, and the Fabii towards the end aretwo examples of famous families shrunken in power. The ideal politicalcareer was set out in the Lex Villia of 180 BC: military service in onestwenties, quaestor at thirty (conferring membership in the Senate), aedileor tribune in ones mid-thirties, praetor at 39 and consul at 42. But the question arises: how were Roman politicians able to gain electionto these offices and thus be politically successful?The essential ingredient for an aspirantpolitician, whatever his family background, was wealth: the Roman elitewas a moneyed elite. Constant outlay was important in public life:a politician had to spend freely on his clients, on his household, on slaves(particularly gladiators, for personal protection) and on investment. The expenses for elections were also astronomical. Candidates hadto provide themselves with a magnificent retinue and had to provide spectaclesand gifts for the populace: chariot races, theatrical shows, wild beasthunts and particularly gladiators. Direct bribery was also common,and represented a massive outlay in the late 60s, Caesar had accumulateddebts of several thousand talents due to his aedileship, his praetoriancampaign, and his pontifical campaign. In cases of prosecution, wealthwas also necessary to bribe jurors, and all this wealth had to come fromsomewhere -normally the hapless provincials. Indeed, by the lateRepublic it was a standard joke that a governor had to amass three fortunes:one to pay for his election expenses, one to bribe the jury for his extortiontrial, and the third to keep. In most cases, a candidates pedigreewas also important. As many statistical studies have shown (particularlythose of Broughton, Badian and Gruen), the nobility dominated access tothe consulship. Most of the other consuls came from long establishedpraetorian or senatorial families: the actual New Man (one without anysenatorial antecedents who gained the consulship) was a very rare creature:the most famous cases were Marius and Cicero. The importance of goodbreeding was such that Cicero could describe Ahenobarbus as consul-designatefrom the cradle. However, the important question is why nobilitymeant so much. The matter was partly one of actual influence theamount of clientage and money one could bring to bear. But therewere other factors, such as the friendliness of powerful politicians (Ti. Gracchus being the most important example), previous military success (Sullain the 90s) or the public reputation of ones family (Scipio Aemilianusin 148). One necessity for ensuring election toimportant posts or for securing legislation was the support of other membersof the nobility. In many cases, the factor that secured the electionof a candidate was the support of powerful politicians, who the candidatewould be expected to help while in office. The most obvious examplesare Pompeys pet consuls in 61-58, who were able to secure his land legislation,but probable others include Catulus in 102 (for Marius), and L. Scipioin 190 (for his brother). In other cases, a broader familial or factionalsupport base can be guessed at, such as with Hortensius in 69, Sulla in88 or Bibulus in 59. These were all cases in which sharp politicalissues informed campaigns. However, there were also cases in whichobligations and friendships (referring to political friendship or amicitia)had been built up over time. The classic example is Cicero, who despitebeing a New Man, was elected senior consul in suo anno in 63, simply byhaving a large group of grateful defendants whose support he could callon, and by having very few enemies. .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757 , .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757 .postImageUrl , .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757 , .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757:hover , .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757:visited , .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757:active { border:0!important; } .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757:active , .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757 .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u6240605825bad05d5c4d9f2c94c7f757:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Social Issues EssayThese horizontal connections within theelite also had to be supplemented by vertical connections with the lowerorders of Roman society. The most enduring and stable of these connectionswas that of clientage. Roman politicians could call on their clientsto campaign for them, solicit for them and even fight for them, as wellas voting for them (although this could not be enforced, with the introductionof the secret ballot). However, as Brunts and Badians studies haveshown, clientage was a most complicated institution. Its stabilitywas relative, since people and groups could have more than one patron andthey could change over time. Still, the more clients a politicianhad, particularly those of influence or urban residence, the more supportin the lower orders he could gain. Particularly important to the nobilityand their ethos, and also to political success and popularity in as militaristica state as Rome, was success and bravery in battle. Rome was a societyfounded upon war, and her history was one of strife and conquest. One of the greatest attractions of the praetorship and consulship was thatthey conferred imperium, which gave the bearer the right to command armies. This was the main purpose of Romes magistrates for most of her history,and even when they had become mostly civilian magistrates, as propraetorsand proconsuls they still went out to govern provinces and wage wars. War provided an opportunity for reputations to be made, for prizes to beawarded to young nobles: we need only think of Scipio Africanus92 roleat Cannae or Caesars civic crown at Mytilene. For those commandingthe army, war provided many more opportunities. They could establishtheir names in history and achieve personal glory (one thinks particularlyof Caesar in Gaul). They could make massive fortunes (for in theancient world war normally brought home a handsome profit to the victors)from the amassing of booty or the sale of large numbers of slaves (AemiliusPaullus in 167, Marius and Catulus in 101, Caesar in 58 and 57). All of these gave successful commanders an important position in politics,resting on the twin bastions of their wealth and fame. A few commanderscould also hope for future support from their soldiers, although the circumstancesseems unclear. It seems, however, that only those commanders whohad made their soldiers rich (Sulla in the East 88-83, Pompey in the East66-62, Caesar in Gaul 58-50) realistically hoped for political supportfrom their veterans. However, with a few unfortunate exceptions,all of this military activity after the beginning of the third centurytook place a long way from Rome, the centre of public life. For apolitician to advance his career, he had to do so in full view of the populusRomanus, in the Senate-house and in the Forum. From the mid thirdcentury, the concept of largesse (largitio) takes hold in public life. This meant that the approval of the people had to be sought by a candidatethrough showing magnificence: expending wealth and other private resourcesin the service and the interests of the people. Through the expansionand enrichment of the Roman empire, and the intense competition of theRoman elite, the sums necessary became very large. Indeed it becamesuch a problem that at some stage a law was passed forbidding games givenby candidates for public office. This largesse could take many forms. The normal mode was the giving of games. Normally games were theproperty of aediles, who spent enormous sums on their games to make surethey would be remembered when they campaigned for the consulship. Aediles could also stage games for their friends who were candidates: thesewere normally funeral games in honour of a deceased ancestor, and consistedof pairs of gladiators (the most spectacular were, predictably, Caesarsin honour of his father, during his aedileship). The other type ofgames were votive games, celebrated by victorious generals (Sulla in 80and Pompey in 70). Another popular form was a public feast (possiblySulla during his dictatorship, and Crassus in 70), or the provision ofgrain at private expense (Crassus in 70 again, or Spurius Maelius in 439). .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5 , .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5 .postImageUrl , .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5 , .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5:hover , .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5:visited , .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5:active { border:0!important; } .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5:active , .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5 .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u8d5752589eaff56e06ad5656e930ffa5:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: American Beauty1 EssayA more permanent benefaction was the erection of structures near the Forum,such as the many basilicas erected during the middle and late Republic(by the Porcii, Sempronii, Aemilii and Opimii), or the astonishingly expensiveForum of Caesar, begun during the late 50s. Roman politicians lived in a competitiveatmosphere where they vied with other members of the senatorial elite foradvancement. This advancement was expressed through the holding ofmagistracies which had to be sought from the People. There were manyfactors which contributed to the outcome of this competition. Whichpoliticians were able to advance depended on those with the best resourcesin wealth, birth, alliances, clients, military success and public repute. It was all of these factors, in varying degrees of importance with differentpersonalities, circumstances, and eras, which were the secrets of politicalsuccess under the Republic.